Page Index

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
4 GB 170
5,474
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 765M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 760
brand logoGeForce GTX 970
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+43.8%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,474 vs 7,869).
  • ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+43.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 5,474 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013, 43.8% more raw performance headroom, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 43.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low100 FPS94 FPS
medium86 FPS83 FPS
high68 FPS70 FPS
ultra40 FPS58 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS87 FPS
medium77 FPS74 FPS
high53 FPS60 FPS
ultra31 FPS50 FPS
4K
low28 FPS41 FPS
medium26 FPS39 FPS
high17 FPS27 FPS
ultra15 FPS24 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMOpen GeForce GTX 1650
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low123 FPS136 FPS
medium91 FPS113 FPS
high69 FPS94 FPS
ultra44 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low67 FPS79 FPS
medium45 FPS62 FPS
high33 FPS44 FPS
ultra23 FPS35 FPS
4K
low25 FPS36 FPS
medium17 FPS27 FPS
high13 FPS21 FPS
ultra9 FPS15 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMOpen GeForce GTX 1650
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low246 FPS323 FPS
medium197 FPS283 FPS
high164 FPS205 FPS
ultra123 FPS169 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS225 FPS
medium148 FPS202 FPS
high123 FPS151 FPS
ultra92 FPS117 FPS
4K
low123 FPS130 FPS
medium99 FPS117 FPS
high82 FPS79 FPS
ultra62 FPS50 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMOpen GeForce GTX 1650
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low154 FPS261 FPS
medium125 FPS211 FPS
high112 FPS191 FPS
ultra86 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low113 FPS201 FPS
medium93 FPS158 FPS
high84 FPS135 FPS
ultra60 FPS113 FPS
4K
low66 FPS99 FPS
medium52 FPS74 FPS
high43 FPS65 FPS
ultra28 FPS51 FPS
Open GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMOpen GeForce GTX 1650
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 43.8%. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
5,474
7,869+44%
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1344+50%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1665 MHz+70%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+100%
56
L1 Cache
112 KB
896 KB+700%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+50%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
170W
75W-56%
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
241mm
229mm
Height
—
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
32.2
104.9+226%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
—
$149
Codename
GK104
TU117
Release
September 27 2013
April 23 2019
Ranking
#417
#323