CMP 40HX vs GeForce GTX 1650

CMP 40HX

2021Core: 1470 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz

Popular choices:

GTX 1650
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

CMP 40HX

2021

Why buy it

  • +11.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 369.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 146.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $550 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 321.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 185W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 8,749).
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is CMP 40HX better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Yes. CMP 40HX is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 11.2% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
CMP 40HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019, 11.2% more raw performance headroom, and 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
CMP 40HX is about 369.1% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 11.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, CMP 40HX is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, CMP 40HX earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low146 FPS94 FPS
medium135 FPS83 FPS
high114 FPS70 FPS
ultra86 FPS58 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS87 FPS
medium111 FPS74 FPS
high92 FPS60 FPS
ultra72 FPS50 FPS
4K
low58 FPS41 FPS
medium51 FPS39 FPS
high41 FPS27 FPS
ultra37 FPS24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low313 FPS136 FPS
medium255 FPS113 FPS
high208 FPS94 FPS
ultra176 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low212 FPS79 FPS
medium170 FPS62 FPS
high141 FPS44 FPS
ultra115 FPS35 FPS
4K
low116 FPS36 FPS
medium95 FPS27 FPS
high78 FPS21 FPS
ultra59 FPS15 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low394 FPS323 FPS
medium315 FPS283 FPS
high262 FPS205 FPS
ultra197 FPS169 FPS
1440p
low295 FPS225 FPS
medium236 FPS202 FPS
high197 FPS151 FPS
ultra148 FPS117 FPS
4K
low197 FPS130 FPS
medium157 FPS117 FPS
high131 FPS79 FPS
ultra98 FPS50 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low341 FPS261 FPS
medium273 FPS211 FPS
high241 FPS191 FPS
ultra197 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low263 FPS201 FPS
medium213 FPS158 FPS
high183 FPS135 FPS
ultra148 FPS113 FPS
4K
low139 FPS99 FPS
medium111 FPS74 FPS
high102 FPS65 FPS
ultra81 FPS51 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

CMP 40HX

The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the CMP 40HX leads by 11.2%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
8,749+11%
7,869
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304+157%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.603 TFLOPS+155%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1665 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
144+157%
56
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+161%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 40HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 4th gen.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
No
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
No
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 84.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
185W
75W-59%
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
229mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
47.3
104.9+122%
💰

Value Analysis

The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 78.7% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 322.4% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$699
$149-79%
Performance per Dollar
12.5
52.8+322%
Codename
TU106
TU117
Release
February 25 2021
April 23 2019
Ranking
#302
#323