Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPU

GPU

Arc A730M

2022Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A730M

12 GB 80

9,808

+24.6%

7,869

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A730M

2022

Why buy it

✅92.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Arc A730M

2022

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅92.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A730M better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Arc A730M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Arc A730M averages 92.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 9,808 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Arc A730M is a 2022 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A730M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, 24.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A730M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 92.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 24.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Arc A730M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Arc A730M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A730M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	151 FPS	94 FPS
medium	130 FPS	83 FPS
high	116 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	58 FPS
1440p
low	118 FPS	87 FPS
medium	98 FPS	74 FPS
high	81 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	54 FPS	41 FPS
medium	47 FPS	39 FPS
high	36 FPS	27 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	24 FPS

Open Arc A730M Open GeForce GTX 1650

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	294 FPS	136 FPS
medium	259 FPS	113 FPS
high	213 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	79 FPS
medium	177 FPS	62 FPS
high	145 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	36 FPS
medium	88 FPS	27 FPS
high	73 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	15 FPS

Open Arc A730M Open GeForce GTX 1650

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	441 FPS	323 FPS
medium	353 FPS	283 FPS
high	294 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	331 FPS	225 FPS
medium	265 FPS	202 FPS
high	221 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	221 FPS	130 FPS
medium	177 FPS	117 FPS
high	147 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	50 FPS

Open Arc A730M Open GeForce GTX 1650

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	299 FPS	261 FPS
medium	256 FPS	211 FPS
high	212 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	237 FPS	201 FPS
medium	207 FPS	158 FPS
high	173 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	140 FPS	99 FPS
medium	117 FPS	74 FPS
high	93 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	51 FPS

Open Arc A730M Open GeForce GTX 1650

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A730M and GeForce GTX 1650

Arc A730M

The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A730M scores 9,808 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Arc A730M leads by 24.6%. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	9,808+25%	7,869
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3072+243%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.6 TFLOPS+322%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+23%	1665 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	192+243%	56
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+411%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB+1100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A730M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A730M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Arc A730M offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 162.5% advantage for the Arc A730M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+163%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	12 MB+1100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc A730M	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	80W	75W-6%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	229mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	122.6+17%	104.9