
GeForce RTX 4090
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4090
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($1,599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 19.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 450W instead of 575W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (512 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 5090
2025Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 512).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$1,599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 575W vs 450W.
GeForce RTX 4090
2022GeForce RTX 5090
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($1,599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 19.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 450W instead of 575W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 512).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (512 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$1,599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 575W vs 450W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5090 better than GeForce RTX 4090?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 4090 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 955 FPS | 955 FPS |
| medium | 795 FPS | 785 FPS |
| high | 632 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 796 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 641 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 288 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| ultra | 858 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 988 FPS | 988 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 902 FPS |
| high | 832 FPS | 832 FPS |
| ultra | 643 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 388 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 927 FPS | 977 FPS |
| ultra | 819 FPS | 866 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 943 FPS |
| medium | 786 FPS | 832 FPS |
| high | 684 FPS | 724 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 653 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 609 FPS |
| high | 513 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 and GeForce RTX 5090

GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090
The GeForce RTX 4090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,112 points. Launch price was $1,599.

GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090
The GeForce RTX 5090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,867 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4090 scores 38,112 and the GeForce RTX 5090 reaches 38,867 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5090 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 128 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 170 (GeForce RTX 5090) with 512 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38,112 | 38,867+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 16384 | 21760+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+5% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 512 | 680+33% |
| L1 Cache | 16 MB | 21.3 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 128 | 170+33% |
| Tensor Cores | 512 | 680+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5090 is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4090 tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5090 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4090 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5090 has 32 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090) — a 77.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 5090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 32 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 512-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5090). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 draws 450W versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 575W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 304mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W-22% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 304mm | 304mm |
| Height | 137mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.7+25% | 67.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 launched at $1599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5090 launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 4090 costs 20% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.8 (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 19.4 (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 4090 offers 22.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 5090 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599-20% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.8+23% | 19.4 |
| Codename | AD102 | GB202 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #4 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












