
GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4080
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.7 vs 19.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 575W, a 255W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (34,445 vs 38,867).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 5090
2025Why buy it
- ✅+12.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅123.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 304).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ❌79.7% higher power demand at 575W vs 320W.
GeForce RTX 4080
2022GeForce RTX 5090
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.7 vs 19.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 575W, a 255W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+12.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅123.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 304).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (34,445 vs 38,867).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ❌79.7% higher power demand at 575W vs 320W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5090 better than GeForce RTX 4080?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 4080 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 818 FPS | 880 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 525 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 335 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 999 FPS | 698 FPS |
| ultra | 775 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 988 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 963 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 830 FPS | 907 FPS |
| ultra | 737 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 793 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 690 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 585 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 5090

GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.

GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090
The GeForce RTX 5090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,867 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 scores 34,445 versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 38,867 — the GeForce RTX 5090 leads by 12.8%. The GeForce RTX 4080 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5090 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090). Raw compute: 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 170 (GeForce RTX 5090) with 304 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34,445 | 38,867+13% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728 | 21760+124% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+115% |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz+4% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 304 | 680+124% |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB | 21.3 MB+124% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 96 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | 170+124% |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | 680+124% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5090 is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4080 tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5090 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4080 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5090 has 32 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090) — a 143.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 5090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 736 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+143% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 96 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5090). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 draws 320W versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 575W — a 57% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 310mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W-44% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-25% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 310mm | 304mm |
| Height | 140mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 107.6+59% | 67.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5090 launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 4080 costs 40% less ($800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.7 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 19.4 (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 4080 offers 47.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 5090 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199-40% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.7+48% | 19.4 |
| Codename | AD103 | GB202 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #7 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












