
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 285mm, a 125mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅158.2% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌78.1% longer card at 285mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 285mm, a 125mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅158.2% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌78.1% longer card at 285mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 193.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 72 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 31,578+194% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 7680+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+492% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2610 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 72 | 240+233% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 7.5 MB+226% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 60+233% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 240+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 504 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 121.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-75% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-57% | 700W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+39% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 78.8% less ($630 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 61% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-79% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+61% | 39.5 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












