
GeForce RTX 3080
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3080
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 102.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (272 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅20.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 272).
- ✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 10 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌114.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3080
2020GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 102.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅20.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 272).
- ✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 10 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (272 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌114.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 better than GeForce RTX 3080?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3080 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 869 FPS | 909 FPS |
| medium | 706 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 711 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 821 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 765 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 656 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 609 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 534 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 299 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3080 and GeForce RTX 3090

GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
The GeForce RTX 3080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 8704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,071 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3080 scores 25,071 versus the GeForce RTX 3090's 26,594 — the GeForce RTX 3090 leads by 6.1%. The GeForce RTX 3080 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3090 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 8,704 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090). Raw compute: 29.77 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 82 (GeForce RTX 3090) with 272 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,071 | 26,594+6% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 8704 | 10496+21% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.77 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 112+17% |
| TMUs | 272 | 328+21% |
| L1 Cache | 8.5 MB | 10.3 MB+21% |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 6 MB+20% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68 | 82+21% |
| Tensor Cores | 272 | 328+21% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3080 comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 140% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 760 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) — a 23.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 320-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 5 MB (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) — the GeForce RTX 3090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB | 24 GB+140% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 760 GB/s | 936 GB/s+23% |
| Bus Width | 320-bit | 384-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 6 MB+20% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3080) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3080 draws 320W versus the GeForce RTX 3090's 350W — a 9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3090). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 312mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W-9% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 312mm |
| Height | 112mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 78.3+3% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3080 launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499. The GeForce RTX 3080 costs 53.4% less ($800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 17.7 (GeForce RTX 3090) — the GeForce RTX 3080 offers 102.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-53% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.9+103% | 17.7 |
| Codename | GA102 | GA102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #41 | #37 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












