
Arc A770M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A770M
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Arc A770M
2022GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Arc A770M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Arc A770M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Arc A770M
Arc A770M
The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM reaches 11,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 512 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,853 | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+60% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.79 TFLOPS+87% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+17% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+220% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+140% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+60% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 512+540% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A770M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+129% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 8% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A770M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-8% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 235mm |
| Height | 0mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 98.8+8% | 91.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













