
Arc A580
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A580
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌34.6% higher power demand at 175W vs 130W.
- ❌15.3% longer card at 271mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 175W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 271mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌39.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Arc A580
2023GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 175W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 271mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌34.6% higher power demand at 175W vs 130W.
- ❌15.3% longer card at 271mm vs 235mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌39.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A580 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A580 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Arc A580
Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM reaches 11,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A580) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 384 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,060+1% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+37% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+14% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+20% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 384+380% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A580) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A580. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+129% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 29.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 271mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 130W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 271mm | 235mm |
| Height | 132mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 91.5+33% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A580 launched at $179 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The Arc A580 costs 28.1% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Arc A580 offers 41% better value. The Arc A580 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-28% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.4+41% | 47.8 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA106 |
| Release | October 10 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #223 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













