
GeForce GTX 980
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌388.9% higher power demand at 220W vs 45W.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 220W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 980
2014GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 220W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌388.9% higher power demand at 220W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile better than GeForce GTX 980?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 106 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 and GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1343 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,269 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile reaches 11,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 1,792 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 4.813 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1343 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,077 | 11,269+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.981 TFLOPS+3% | 4.813 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz | 1343 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.8 MB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+75% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile's 45W — a 132.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 45W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.4 | 250.4+397% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GA106 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | 2024 |
| Ranking | #245 | #242 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












