
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
2014GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB better than GeForce GTX 980M SLI?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M SLI still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M SLI and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,523 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI scores 12,523 and the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB reaches 12,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,523 | 12,535 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1777 MHz+58% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980M SLI is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 224 GB/s+40% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 42.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 130W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 66°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 62.6 | 96.4+54% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | — | GA106 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #263 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













