
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 242mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅1.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 24.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌39.9% longer card at 242mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 242mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅1.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 24.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌39.9% longer card at 242mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 24.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,535+25% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1777 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.5 MB+166% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 32.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 130W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 66°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 96.4+72% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 24.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 50.3+25% |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













