
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅13.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (272 vs 240).
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 285W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅60.6% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 272), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌62.9% higher power demand at 285W vs 175W.
- ❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
2019GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅13.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (272 vs 240).
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 285W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅60.6% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 272), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌62.9% higher power demand at 285W vs 175W.
- ❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 741 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 593 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 371 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 278 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 9 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,477 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER scores 16,477 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 91.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,176 (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 7.181 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 272 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,477 | 31,578+92% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2176 | 7680+253% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.181 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+458% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2610 MHz+58% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 136 | 240+76% |
| L1 Cache | 2.1 MB | 7.5 MB+257% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 60+76% |
| Tensor Cores | 272+13% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 504 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8 (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER draws 175W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 47.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-39% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-21% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 285mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 94.2 | 110.8+18% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER launched at $399 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER costs 50.1% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 41.3 (GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER offers 4.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3+5% | 39.5 |
| Codename | TU106 | AD104 |
| Release | July 9 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #121 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












