
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (272 vs 136).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,935 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌17.8% HIGHER MSRP$470 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($470 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+42.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 272), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
2021GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (272 vs 136).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+42.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,935 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌17.8% HIGHER MSRP$470 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($470 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 272), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce RTX 2060 12GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 12GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 717 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 538 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 12GB and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 184W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,935 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB scores 15,935 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 42.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,176 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 7.181 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 272 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,935 | 22,651+42% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2176 | 4352+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.181 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+207% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2535 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 136 | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 2.1 MB | 4.3 MB+105% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 32 MB+967% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 272+100% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 12GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 32 MB+967% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB draws 184W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 14% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 88°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 184W | 160W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 88°C | 70°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.6 | 141.6+64% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB launched at $470 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 15.1% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.9 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 67.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $470 | $399-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.9 | 56.8+68% |
| Codename | TU106 | AD106 |
| Release | December 7 2021 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #133 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













