
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌114.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌114.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti better than GeForce MX570 A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX570 A make more sense than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce MX570 A

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the GeForce MX570 A reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce MX570 A uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1155 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350+2% | 6,208 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+121% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+21% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 2 MB+614% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s+17% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the GeForce MX570 A's 25W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce MX570 A). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 25W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 211mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 248.3+174% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP, while the GeForce MX570 A launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 53.3% less ($160 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 119.3% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-53% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4+119% | 20.7 |
| Codename | GP107 | GA107 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #381 | #387 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













