
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+170.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 171.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌620% higher power demand at 180W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 180W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌0.4% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅+170.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 171.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 180W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌620% higher power demand at 180W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌0.4% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX450 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 42 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 42 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce MX450

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce MX450's 3,720 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 170.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce MX450 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 896 (GeForce MX450). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+171% | 3,720 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+186% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+175% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+10% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX450 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) — a 140% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+140% | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce MX450's 25W — a 151.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce MX450). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 25W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 148.8+166% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce MX450 launched at $250. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 0.4% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 14.9 (GeForce MX450) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 171.1% better value. The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+171% | 14.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #137 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













