
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
2015GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 29 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 980M

GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,366 points. Launch price was $395.82.

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) scores 7,366 and the GeForce GTX 980M reaches 7,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 980M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M). Raw compute: 4.358 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1127 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,366 | 7,353 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.358 TFLOPS+163% | 1.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz+8% | 1127 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+33% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980 (móvel). Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+40% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (2nd Gen) (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (2nd Gen) | NVENC 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 980M's 100W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 980M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 73.7 | 73.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












