
Arc B570
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- ✅53.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 203.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌196.3% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Arc B570
2025GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅53.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 203.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌196.3% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc B570 better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Arc B570
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the GeForce GTX 980 Ti reaches 13,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060+3% | 13,711 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS+90% | 6.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+133% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 144 | 176+22% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+350% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+500% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc B570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc B570 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 6 GB. The Arc B570 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 380 GB/s (Arc B570) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — a 13.1% advantage for the Arc B570. Bus width: 160-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 380 GB/s+13% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 384-bit+140% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti).
| Feature | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | NVENC 3.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 980 Ti's 250W — a 50% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 249mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 249mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7+71% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649. The Arc B570 costs 66.3% less ($430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — the Arc B570 offers 204.3% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc B570 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-66% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+204% | 21.1 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GM200 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | June 2 2015 |
| Ranking | #169 | #179 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













