
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌208.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 81W.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 81W instead of 250W, a 169W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 81W instead of 250W, a 169W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌208.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 81W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE better than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 make more sense than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE reaches 6,707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 6,707+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+80% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+56% | 2.657 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1038 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 480 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) — a 140% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+140% | 120 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE's 81W — a 102.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 81W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 82.8+218% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | — |
| Codename | GK110B | GM204 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | October 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #487 | #408 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












