
GeForce GTX 960A
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 960A
2015GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960A better than GeForce GTX 960M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960A and GeForce GTX 960M

GeForce GTX 960A
GeForce GTX 960A
The GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,465 points.

GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960A scores 3,465 and the GeForce GTX 960M reaches 3,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 960M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 960M). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,465+3% | 3,375 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS | 1.505 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1176 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960A comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 960M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 960M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 960M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 960A) vs NVENC (4th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC (1st Gen).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC (4th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC (1st Gen) |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960A draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 960M's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 960M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960A) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 960M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 46.2+3% | 45.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













