
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
2010GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 950M better than GeForce GTX 470M SLI?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 470M SLI make more sense than GeForce GTX 950M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 470M SLI | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 470M SLI | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 470M SLI | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 470M SLI | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 470M SLI and GeForce GTX 950M

GeForce GTX 470M SLI
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,540 points.

GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 470M SLI scores 2,540 and the GeForce GTX 950M reaches 2,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 950M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M SLI | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,540 | 2,575+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 576 | 640+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M SLI | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M SLI | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 470M SLI draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 950M's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M SLI | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.9 | 34.3+1% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












