
FireStream 9370
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FireStream 9370
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
FireStream 9370
2010GeForce GTX 950M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 950M better than FireStream 9370?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does FireStream 9370 make more sense than GeForce GTX 950M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 950M

FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the GeForce GTX 950M reaches 2,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 950M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950M). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528 | 2,575+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+150% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+83% | 1.439 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 950M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FireStream 9370 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950M has 2 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 950M's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2 | 34.3+206% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | — |
| Codename | Cypress | GM107 |
| Release | June 23 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #631 | #626 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












