
GeForce GTX 580M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 580M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 580M
2011GeForce GTX 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 645 better than GeForce GTX 580M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 580M make more sense than GeForce GTX 645?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 580M and GeForce GTX 645

GeForce GTX 580M
GeForce GTX 580M
The GeForce GTX 580M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,878 points.

GeForce GTX 645
GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 580M scores 1,878 and the GeForce GTX 645 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 645 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 645). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,878 | 1,880 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+9% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS+11% | 0.8554 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+45% | 44 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 704 KB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 580M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 580M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 580M) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 580M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 580M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 645's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 580M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 580M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 645). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-50% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 147mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 80-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.8+100% | 9.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 580M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580M | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | GF114 | GF100 |
| Release | June 28 2011 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #700 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












