FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 645

FirePro M5100

2013Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

2010Core: 607 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro M5100

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
  • Measures 82mm instead of 147mm, a 65mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 645

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
  • 79.3% longer card at 147mm vs 82mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 645 better than FirePro M5100?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,874 vs 1,880 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 645 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M5100 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010, more VRAM at 2 GB instead of 1 GB, and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 645 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $150 MSRP. GeForce GTX 645 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 645 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $150 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.3% higher G3D Mark. FirePro M5100 is the newer 2013 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (150W vs 200W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does FirePro M5100 make more sense than GeForce GTX 645?
Yes. FirePro M5100 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (150W vs 200W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 645. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 645 currently gives you 0.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
1080p
low28 FPS82 FPS
medium17 FPS68 FPS
high10 FPS47 FPS
ultra5 FPS30 FPS
1440p
low13 FPS63 FPS
medium7 FPS51 FPS
high3 FPS33 FPS
ultra2 FPS21 FPS
4K
low5 FPS23 FPS
medium3 FPS22 FPS
high1 FPS13 FPS
ultra1 FPS11 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
1080p
low40 FPS85 FPS
medium21 FPS65 FPS
high15 FPS53 FPS
ultra11 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low18 FPS52 FPS
medium10 FPS34 FPS
high6 FPS24 FPS
ultra5 FPS19 FPS
4K
low5 FPS25 FPS
medium3 FPS16 FPS
high3 FPS12 FPS
ultra2 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
1080p
low84 FPS85 FPS
medium67 FPS68 FPS
high56 FPS56 FPS
ultra42 FPS42 FPS
1440p
low63 FPS63 FPS
medium51 FPS51 FPS
high42 FPS42 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
4K
low42 FPS42 FPS
medium34 FPS34 FPS
high28 FPS28 FPS
ultra21 FPS21 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
1080p
low84 FPS85 FPS
medium67 FPS68 FPS
high56 FPS56 FPS
ultra42 FPS42 FPS
1440p
low63 FPS63 FPS
medium51 FPS51 FPS
high42 FPS42 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
4K
low41 FPS42 FPS
medium31 FPS34 FPS
high26 FPS28 FPS
ultra17 FPS21 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 645

AMD

FirePro M5100

The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the GeForce GTX 645 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 645 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 645). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645).

FeatureFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
G3D Mark Score
1,874
1,880
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+82%
352
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.992 TFLOPS+16%
0.8554 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
44+10%
L1 Cache
160 KB
704 KB+340%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 645 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro M5100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M5100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB. The FirePro M5100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M5100) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
DirectX
12 (FL11_1)+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645).

FeatureFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder
UVD 4.0
PureVideo VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 645's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro M5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 645). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 82mm vs 147mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.

FeatureFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
TDP
150W-25%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
82mm
147mm
Height
70mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80
Perf/Watt
12.5+33%
9.4
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M5100 launched at $0 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150. The FirePro M5100 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M5100) vs 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) — the FirePro M5100 offers Infinity% better value. The FirePro M5100 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro M5100GeForce GTX 645
MSRP
$0-100%
$150
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
12.5
Codename
Venus
GF100
Release
October 16 2013
May 31 2010
Ranking
#701
#618