G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 580: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 580 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 244W, a 169W reduction.
✅Measures 210mm instead of 267mm, a 57mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 580 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 580

2010

Why buy it

✅16.0% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌225.3% higher power demand at 244W vs 75W.
❌27.1% longer card at 267mm vs 210mm.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

GeForce GTX 580

2010

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 580: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 580 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 244W, a 169W reduction.
✅Measures 210mm instead of 267mm, a 57mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅16.0% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 580 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌225.3% higher power demand at 244W vs 75W.
❌27.1% longer card at 267mm vs 210mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 580 better than GeForce GTX 460 768MB?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce GTX 580 averages 16.0% more FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,800 vs 4,634 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 580 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 580 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 580 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 16.0% more estimated average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (4,634 vs 4,800). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (75W vs 244W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce GTX 460 768MB make more sense than GeForce GTX 580?

Yes. GeForce GTX 460 768MB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (75W vs 244W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 580. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 580 currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (4,634 vs 4,800) and 16.0% more estimated average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 580 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
1080p
low	64 FPS	80 FPS
medium	53 FPS	65 FPS
high	37 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	34 FPS
1440p
low	51 FPS	67 FPS
medium	42 FPS	55 FPS
high	26 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	25 FPS
4K
low	21 FPS	24 FPS
medium	20 FPS	23 FPS
high	12 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 768MB Open GeForce GTX 580

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
1080p
low	62 FPS	132 FPS
medium	41 FPS	103 FPS
high	30 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	35 FPS	91 FPS
medium	20 FPS	65 FPS
high	15 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	39 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	42 FPS
medium	7 FPS	32 FPS
high	6 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 768MB Open GeForce GTX 580

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
1080p
low	216 FPS	209 FPS
medium	173 FPS	167 FPS
high	144 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	156 FPS
medium	130 FPS	125 FPS
high	108 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	104 FPS
medium	86 FPS	83 FPS
high	63 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 768MB Open GeForce GTX 580

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
1080p
low	122 FPS	157 FPS
medium	99 FPS	116 FPS
high	86 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	118 FPS
medium	74 FPS	89 FPS
high	64 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	60 FPS
4K
low	54 FPS	70 FPS
medium	43 FPS	50 FPS
high	34 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 768MB Open GeForce GTX 580

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GeForce GTX 580

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

GeForce GTX 580

The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB scores 4,800 and the GeForce GTX 580 reaches 4,634 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 580 uses Fermi 2.0. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 580).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
G3D Mark Score	4,800+4%	4,634
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi 2.0
Shading Units	336	512+52%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 580 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 580 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 580) — a 122.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 580. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	192 GB/s+122%
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs None (GeForce GTX 580). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 580).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 580's 244W — a 106% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 580). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 210mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85 C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 580
TDP	75W-69%	244W
Recommended PSU	450W-18%	550W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	210mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85 C
Perf/Watt	64.0+237%	19.0