
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,639).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌13.7% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅+15.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+15.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,639).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌13.7% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce GTX 1660

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX 1660's 11,639 — the GeForce GTX 1660 leads by 15.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1660 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,639+16% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+82% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+77% | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1785 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+82% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.4 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1660's 120W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 120W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 97.0+74% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 12% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 31.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $219-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 53.1+31% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU116 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | March 14 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #231 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













