
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅56.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌67.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅56.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌67.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 27.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+28% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+186% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+197% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+4% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+186% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+50% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 173mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 300W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | None |
| Length | 173mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 104.9+88% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 40.2% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 30.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $149-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 52.8+31% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













