
Arc A530M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A530M
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
Arc A530M
2023GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A530M better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 267 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A530M and GeForce GTX 1650

Arc A530M
Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A530M scores 8,013 and the GeForce GTX 1650 reaches 7,869 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A530M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Arc A530M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,013+2% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+71% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS+34% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1665 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+71% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A530M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Arc A530M) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 75% advantage for the Arc A530M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A530M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+75% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A530M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A530M draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A530M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-13% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 123.3+18% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A530M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Codename | DG2-256 | TU117 |
| Release | August 1 2023 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #317 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













