
Arc A770
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A770
2022Why buy it
- ✅30.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌8.6% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Arc A770
2022GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅30.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌8.6% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A770 better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 152 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 395 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 104 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and GeForce GTX 1070

Arc A770
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the GeForce GTX 1070 reaches 13,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1070 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1683 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332 | 13,507+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+113% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS+204% | 6.463 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+43% | 1683 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+113% | 120 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A770 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1070 has 8 GB. The Arc A770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) — a 100% advantage for the Arc A770. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+100% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070).
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1070's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1070). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 280mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 90.0+52% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A770 launched at $349 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379. The Arc A770 costs 7.9% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) — the Arc A770 offers 7.3% better value. The Arc A770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-8% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+7% | 35.6 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GP104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | June 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #191 | #185 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













