
Arc A730M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A730M
2022Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Arc A730M
2022GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A730M better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A730M and GeForce GTX 1060

Arc A730M
Arc A730M
The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the GeForce GTX 1060 reaches 10,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,808 | 10,064+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.6 TFLOPS+42% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+18% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+379% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A730M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A730M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Arc A730M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 75% advantage for the Arc A730M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+75% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 76.9% difference. The Arc A730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-56% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 173mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6+119% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A730M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GP104 |
| Release | 2022 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #264 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













