
Arc A730M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A730M
2022Why buy it
- ✅80.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Arc A730M
2022GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅80.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A730M better than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 3GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A730M and GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

Arc A730M
Arc A730M
The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB reaches 9,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1708 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,808 | 9,815 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+167% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.6 TFLOPS+220% | 3.935 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+20% | 1708 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+167% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+971% | 0.42 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+700% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A730M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A730M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3 GB. The Arc A730M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — a 75% advantage for the Arc A730M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+300% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+75% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+700% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB).
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB's 120W — a 40% difference. The Arc A730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 250mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-33% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 250mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6+50% | 81.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A730M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GP106 |
| Release | 2022 | August 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #264 | #272 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













