
GeForce 830A
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 640
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce 830A
2014Why buy it
- ✅52.5% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 65W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
GeForce GT 640
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 830A across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌97% higher power demand at 65W vs 33W.
GeForce 830A
2014GeForce GT 640
2012Why buy it
- ✅52.5% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 65W, a 32W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 830A across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌97% higher power demand at 65W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce 830A better than GeForce GT 640?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GT 640 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 830A and GeForce GT 640

GeForce 830A
GeForce 830A
The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

GeForce GT 640
GeForce GT 640
The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 830A scores 1,173 and the GeForce GT 640 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 640 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830A) vs 384 (GeForce GT 640). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,173 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.6927 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 830A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 640 has 4 GB. The GeForce GT 640 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 830A) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640) — the GeForce 830A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830A) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 640). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce 830A) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640). Decoder: VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 830A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP6 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 830A draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 640's 65W — a 65.3% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830A) vs 300W (GeForce GT 640). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-49% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5+97% | 18.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 830A launched at $100 MSRP, while the GeForce GT 640 launched at $99. The GeForce GT 640 costs 1% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.7 (GeForce 830A) vs 11.8 (GeForce GT 640) — the GeForce GT 640 offers 0.9% better value. The GeForce 830A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $99-1% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.7 | 11.8 |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #832 | #837 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













