
FX-6350
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
FX-6350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $317 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,640 vs 27,712).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +150.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 75.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌240.2% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$132 MSRP
FX-6350
2013Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $317 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +150.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 75.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,640 vs 27,712).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌240.2% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$132 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than FX-6350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FX-6350 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FX-6350 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FX-6350 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FX-6350 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 5800X

FX-6350
FX-6350
The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The FX-6350 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The FX-6350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6350 scores 4,640 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 142.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | FX-6350 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6144 kB+1100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 4,640 | 27,712+497% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6350 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-6350) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | FX-6350 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The FX-6350 launched at $132 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($132 vs $449), the FX-6350 is $317 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6350 delivers 35.2 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 54.9% better value option.
| Feature | FX-6350 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $132-71% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.2 | 61.7+75% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












