
Core i5-6300HQ
Popular choices:

FX-6350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-6300HQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while FX-6350 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6350 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
FX-6350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,640 vs 4,672).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while Core i5-6300HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6300HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-6300HQ
2015FX-6350
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while FX-6350 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6350 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,640 vs 4,672).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while Core i5-6300HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6300HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-6300HQ better than FX-6350?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-6300HQ | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-6300HQ | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-6300HQ | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-6300HQ | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6300HQ and FX-6350

Core i5-6300HQ
Core i5-6300HQ
The Core i5-6300HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,672 points. Launch price was $250.

FX-6350
FX-6350
The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-6300HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-6300HQ versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 27% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-6300HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6300HQ scores 4,672 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-6300HQ.
| Feature | Core i5-6300HQ | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6144 kB+500% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,672 | 4,640 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-6300HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-6300HQ | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6300HQ) / not specified (FX-6350). The Core i5-6300HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the FX-6350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6300HQ targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6300HQ rivals A12-9730P.
| Feature | Core i5-6300HQ | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













