EPYC 9734 vs EPYC 9754

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9734

2023

Why buy it

✅+3.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($9,600 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($9,600 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 340W instead of 360W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (98,450 vs 102,286).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).

EPYC 9734

2023

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

✅+3.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($9,600 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($9,600 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 340W instead of 360W, a 20W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (98,450 vs 102,286).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9734 better than EPYC 9754?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 9754 is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9734 pulls ahead with 3.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9734 is the better fit. You are getting 3.9% better PassMark, backed by 112 cores and 224 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9734 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9734 is $2,300 cheaper on MSRP at $9,600 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it gives you 3.9% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 9754 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 28.8% better value on MSRP (10.7 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9754 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9734 Benchmark Check

EPYC 9754 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9734	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	163 FPS	163 FPS
medium	134 FPS	134 FPS
high	113 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	143 FPS
medium	114 FPS	114 FPS
high	90 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	68 FPS
medium	58 FPS	58 FPS
high	45 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	37 FPS

Open EPYC 9734 Open EPYC 9754

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9734	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	238 FPS	238 FPS
medium	211 FPS	211 FPS
high	174 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	195 FPS	195 FPS
medium	177 FPS	177 FPS
high	151 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	121 FPS
medium	112 FPS	112 FPS
high	97 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	79 FPS

Open EPYC 9734 Open EPYC 9754

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9734	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	650 FPS	650 FPS
medium	541 FPS	541 FPS
high	481 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	422 FPS
1440p
low	503 FPS	503 FPS
medium	418 FPS	418 FPS
high	365 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	318 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	371 FPS
medium	289 FPS	289 FPS
high	246 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	199 FPS

Open EPYC 9734 Open EPYC 9754

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9734	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	868 FPS	876 FPS
medium	785 FPS	793 FPS
high	672 FPS	682 FPS
ultra	582 FPS	592 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	695 FPS
medium	600 FPS	602 FPS
high	511 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	430 FPS	435 FPS
4K
low	493 FPS	495 FPS
medium	439 FPS	441 FPS
high	384 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	327 FPS	330 FPS

Open EPYC 9734 Open EPYC 9754

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9734 and EPYC 9754

EPYC 9734

The EPYC 9734 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 112 cores and 224 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 102,286 points. Launch price was $9,600.

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9734 packs 112 cores / 224 threads, while the EPYC 9754 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 9734 versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9754 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). Both are built on the Bergamo (2023) architecture using a 5 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9734 scores 102,286 against the EPYC 9754's 98,450 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 9734. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9734	EPYC 9754
Cores / Threads	112 / 224	128 / 256+14%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.1 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.25 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Bergamo (2023)	Bergamo (2023)
PassMark	102,286+4%	98,450
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	104,584
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,634
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,825

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9734) and SP5 (EPYC 9754).

Feature	EPYC 9734	EPYC 9754
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9734 targets Data Center / High Density, EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native. Direct competitor: EPYC 9734 rivals Xeon 6780E; EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E.

Feature	EPYC 9734	EPYC 9754
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / High Density	Data Center / Cloud Native

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9734 launched at $9600 MSRP, while the EPYC 9754 debuted at $11900. On MSRP ($9600 vs $11900), the EPYC 9734 is $2300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9734 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9754 — making the EPYC 9734 the 25.2% better value option.