PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9634

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($10,304 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 360W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9634 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,825 vs 85,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
❌24.1% higher power demand at 360W vs 290W.

EPYC 9634

2022

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($10,304 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 360W, a 70W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9634 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,825 vs 85,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
❌24.1% higher power demand at 360W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9634 better than EPYC 9754?

Yes. EPYC 9634 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 405.2% better Geekbench multi-core, and 9.6% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9634 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 is the better fit. You are getting 405.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 84 cores and 168 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9634 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9634 is $1,596 cheaper on MSRP at $10,304 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.6% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9754 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9634 Benchmark Check

EPYC 9754 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9634	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	170 FPS	163 FPS
medium	141 FPS	134 FPS
high	122 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	143 FPS
medium	119 FPS	114 FPS
high	97 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	68 FPS
medium	59 FPS	58 FPS
high	47 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	37 FPS

Open EPYC 9634 Open EPYC 9754

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9634	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	280 FPS	238 FPS
medium	246 FPS	211 FPS
high	202 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	230 FPS	195 FPS
medium	207 FPS	177 FPS
high	175 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	121 FPS
medium	130 FPS	112 FPS
high	117 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	79 FPS

Open EPYC 9634 Open EPYC 9754

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9634	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	671 FPS	650 FPS
medium	560 FPS	541 FPS
high	522 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	454 FPS	422 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	503 FPS
medium	425 FPS	418 FPS
high	389 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	318 FPS
4K
low	376 FPS	371 FPS
medium	293 FPS	289 FPS
high	262 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	199 FPS

Open EPYC 9634 Open EPYC 9754

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9634	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	899 FPS	876 FPS
medium	819 FPS	793 FPS
high	706 FPS	682 FPS
ultra	621 FPS	592 FPS
1440p
low	722 FPS	695 FPS
medium	629 FPS	602 FPS
high	538 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	435 FPS
4K
low	518 FPS	495 FPS
medium	462 FPS	441 FPS
high	406 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	330 FPS

Open EPYC 9634 Open EPYC 9754

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9634 and EPYC 9754

EPYC 9634

The EPYC 9634 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 84 cores and 168 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 107,944 points. Launch price was $10,304.

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9634 packs 84 cores / 168 threads, while the EPYC 9754 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 44 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9634 versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9634 (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). The EPYC 9634 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 9754 uses Bergamo (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9634 scores 107,944 against the EPYC 9754's 98,450 — a 9.2% lead for the EPYC 9634. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,800 vs 1,634, a 9.7% lead for the EPYC 9634 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 85,000 vs 16,825 (133.9% advantage for the EPYC 9634). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9634 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754.

Feature	EPYC 9634	EPYC 9754
Cores / Threads	84 / 168	128 / 256+52%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+19%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.25 GHz	2.25 GHz
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+50%	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Bergamo (2023)
PassMark	107,944+10%	98,450
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	104,584
Geekbench 6 Single	1,800+10%	1,634
Geekbench 6 Multi	85,000+405%	16,825

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9634 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (EPYC 9634) and SP5 (EPYC 9754).

Feature	EPYC 9634	EPYC 9754
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9634) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754). Primary use case: EPYC 9634 targets Server/Datacenter, EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native. Direct competitor: EPYC 9634 rivals Xeon 8470; EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E.

Feature	EPYC 9634	EPYC 9754
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Server/Datacenter	Data Center / Cloud Native

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9634 launched at $10304 MSRP, while the EPYC 9754 debuted at $11900. On MSRP ($10304 vs $11900), the EPYC 9634 is $1596 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9634 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9754 — making the EPYC 9634 the 23.5% better value option.