PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9474F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,120 less on MSRP ($6,780 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 82.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($6,780 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9474F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (98,450 vs 102,255).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).

EPYC 9474F

2022

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,120 less on MSRP ($6,780 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 82.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($6,780 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9474F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (98,450 vs 102,255).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9474F better than EPYC 9754?

Yes. EPYC 9474F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 41.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.9% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9474F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 41.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9474F is the better fit. You are getting 3.9% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9474F is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9474F is $5,120 cheaper on MSRP at $6,780 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it gives you a 41.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 82.3% better value on MSRP (15.1 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9754 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9474F Benchmark Check

EPYC 9754 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9474F	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	218 FPS	163 FPS
medium	179 FPS	134 FPS
high	154 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	189 FPS	143 FPS
medium	151 FPS	114 FPS
high	121 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	68 FPS
medium	64 FPS	58 FPS
high	50 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	37 FPS

Open EPYC 9474F Open EPYC 9754

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9474F	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	615 FPS	238 FPS
medium	537 FPS	211 FPS
high	433 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	516 FPS	195 FPS
medium	459 FPS	177 FPS
high	381 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	316 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	320 FPS	121 FPS
medium	288 FPS	112 FPS
high	258 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	79 FPS

Open EPYC 9474F Open EPYC 9754

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9474F	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	787 FPS	650 FPS
medium	671 FPS	541 FPS
high	608 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	534 FPS	422 FPS
1440p
low	586 FPS	503 FPS
medium	497 FPS	418 FPS
high	443 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	318 FPS
4K
low	423 FPS	371 FPS
medium	339 FPS	289 FPS
high	299 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	199 FPS

Open EPYC 9474F Open EPYC 9754

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9474F	EPYC 9754
1080p
low	1075 FPS	876 FPS
medium	974 FPS	793 FPS
high	829 FPS	682 FPS
ultra	732 FPS	592 FPS
1440p
low	819 FPS	695 FPS
medium	717 FPS	602 FPS
high	607 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	435 FPS
4K
low	592 FPS	495 FPS
medium	531 FPS	441 FPS
high	461 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	330 FPS

Open EPYC 9474F Open EPYC 9754

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9754

EPYC 9474F

The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9474F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9754 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 — a 27.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9474F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). The EPYC 9474F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 9754 uses Bergamo (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the EPYC 9754's 98,450 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 9474F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9474F	EPYC 9754
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	128 / 256+167%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+32%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+60%	2.25 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Bergamo (2023)
PassMark	102,255+4%	98,450
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	104,584
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,634
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,825

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and SP5 (EPYC 9754).

Feature	EPYC 9474F	EPYC 9754
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E.

Feature	EPYC 9474F	EPYC 9754
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Data Center / Performance Optimized	Data Center / Cloud Native

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9474F launched at $6780 MSRP, while the EPYC 9754 debuted at $11900. On MSRP ($6780 vs $11900), the EPYC 9474F is $5120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9754 — making the EPYC 9474F the 58.3% better value option.