EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9655P

AMD

EPYC 9565

72 Cores144 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 9655P

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $325 less on MSRP ($10,486 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (135,221 vs 160,490).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).

EPYC 9655P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 15.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 3.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $10,811 MSRPvs$10,486 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655P better than EPYC 9565?
Yes. EPYC 9655P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 18.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9655P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655P is the better fit. You are getting 18.7% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9655P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9655P is 3.1% more expensive on MSRP at $10,811 MSRP versus $10,486 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 15.1% better value on MSRP (14.8 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9655P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 72/144. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9565EPYC 9655P
1080p
low171 FPS170 FPS
medium142 FPS143 FPS
high121 FPS122 FPS
ultra98 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low150 FPS149 FPS
medium120 FPS121 FPS
high98 FPS99 FPS
ultra81 FPS83 FPS
4K
low81 FPS83 FPS
medium69 FPS73 FPS
high55 FPS57 FPS
ultra45 FPS47 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9565EPYC 9655P
1080p
low583 FPS696 FPS
medium511 FPS602 FPS
high415 FPS475 FPS
ultra361 FPS411 FPS
1440p
low492 FPS566 FPS
medium439 FPS501 FPS
high367 FPS414 FPS
ultra302 FPS336 FPS
4K
low306 FPS331 FPS
medium276 FPS295 FPS
high249 FPS267 FPS
ultra222 FPS235 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9565EPYC 9655P
1080p
low747 FPS746 FPS
medium634 FPS633 FPS
high575 FPS589 FPS
ultra506 FPS519 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS561 FPS
medium474 FPS474 FPS
high423 FPS434 FPS
ultra366 FPS376 FPS
4K
low405 FPS411 FPS
medium324 FPS331 FPS
high286 FPS299 FPS
ultra229 FPS238 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9565EPYC 9655P
1080p
low969 FPS1047 FPS
medium875 FPS939 FPS
high752 FPS821 FPS
ultra676 FPS744 FPS
1440p
low780 FPS839 FPS
medium683 FPS733 FPS
high583 FPS641 FPS
ultra513 FPS562 FPS
4K
low551 FPS605 FPS
medium496 FPS539 FPS
high434 FPS477 FPS
ultra380 FPS416 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9565 and EPYC 9655P

AMD

EPYC 9565

The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

AMD

EPYC 9655P

The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9565 packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the EPYC 9655P offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9655P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 versus 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P — a 4.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655P (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9565 scores 135,221 against the EPYC 9655P's 160,490 — a 17.1% lead for the EPYC 9655P. Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9655P
Cores / Threads
72 / 144
96 / 192+33%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz+5%
Base Clock
3.15 GHz+21%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
384 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
135,221
160,490+19%
Geekbench 6 Multi
24,287
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9565) and SP5 (EPYC 9655P).

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9655P
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9655P
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center / Cloud Computing
Data Center / Single Socket
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9565 launched at $10486 MSRP, while the EPYC 9655P debuted at $10811. On MSRP ($10486 vs $10811), the EPYC 9565 is $325 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9565 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 14.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9655P — making the EPYC 9655P the 14.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9565EPYC 9655P
MSRP
$10486-3%
$10811
Performance per Dollar
12.9
14.8+15%
Release Date
2024
2024