EPYC 9565
Popular choices:
Xeon 6781P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9565
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌17% HIGHER MSRP$10,486 MSRPvs$8,960 MSRP
Xeon 6781P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,526 less on MSRP ($8,960 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
- ✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9565 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (117,946 vs 135,221).
EPYC 9565
2024Xeon 6781P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,526 less on MSRP ($8,960 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
- ✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌17% HIGHER MSRP$10,486 MSRPvs$8,960 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9565 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (117,946 vs 135,221).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9565 better than Xeon 6781P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 40 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 583 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 100 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 575 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 303 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 969 FPS | 958 FPS |
| medium | 875 FPS | 864 FPS |
| high | 752 FPS | 745 FPS |
| ultra | 676 FPS | 644 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 780 FPS | 783 FPS |
| medium | 683 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 583 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9565 and Xeon 6781P
EPYC 9565
EPYC 9565
The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.
Xeon 6781P
Xeon 6781P
The Xeon 6781P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 80 cores and 160 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 336 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 117,946 points. Launch price was $8,960.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9565 packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the Xeon 6781P offers 80 cores / 160 threads — the Xeon 6781P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6781P — a 12.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9565 (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9565 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6781P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9565 scores 135,221 against the Xeon 6781P's 117,946 — a 13.6% lead for the EPYC 9565. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565 vs 336 MB (total) on the Xeon 6781P.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 72 / 144 | 80 / 160+11% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.15 GHz+57% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+14% | 336 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 135,221+15% | 117,946 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9565 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6781P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9565 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9565) vs 8 (Xeon 6781P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9565) vs 136 (Xeon 6781P) — the Xeon 6781P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 136+6% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9565) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6781P). Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, Xeon 6781P targets Data Center / Cloud Scale. Direct competitor: EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P; Xeon 6781P rivals EPYC 9655.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Data Center / Cloud Computing | Data Center / Cloud Scale |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9565 launched at $10486 MSRP, while the Xeon 6781P debuted at $8960. On MSRP ($10486 vs $8960), the Xeon 6781P is $1526 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9565 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6781P — making the Xeon 6781P the 2.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | Xeon 6781P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10486 | $8960-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | 13.2+2% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9565 and Xeon 6781P
