
EPYC 9455P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9455P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 15,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.2% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,370 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 214.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9455P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9455P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9455P
2024Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.2% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,370 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 214.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9455P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 15,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9455P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 9455P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 993 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 892 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 767 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 692 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9455P and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 9455P
EPYC 9455P
The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9455P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9455P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 3.15 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9455P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 109.3% lead for the EPYC 9455P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,700, a 31.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 15,000 (155.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9455P vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+500% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.15 GHz | 4.4 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+167% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 116,926+241% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 2,700+38% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 15,000+690% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9455P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB — 173.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9455P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9455P) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9455P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9455P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 9 TB+7100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9455P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9455P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9455P launched at $4819 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($4819 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $4370 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 103.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4819 | $449-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.3 | 76.4+214% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












