EPYC 9355P vs EPYC 9454P

AMD

EPYC 9355P

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 9454P

48 Cores96 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($2,998 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
  • Delivers 57.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
  • Draws 280W instead of 290W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9454P

2022

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9355P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (94,686 vs 97,249).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.6 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 9355P better than EPYC 9454P?
    Yes. EPYC 9355P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 17.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9355P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9355P is the better fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 9355P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9355P is $1,600 cheaper on MSRP at $2,998 MSRP versus $4,598 MSRP, and it gives you a 17.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 57.5% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 20.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 9355P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 48/96. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetEPYC 9355PEPYC 9454P
    1080p
    low174 FPS171 FPS
    medium144 FPS142 FPS
    high124 FPS122 FPS
    ultra101 FPS96 FPS
    1440p
    low152 FPS149 FPS
    medium123 FPS120 FPS
    high101 FPS97 FPS
    ultra84 FPS77 FPS
    4K
    low85 FPS70 FPS
    medium73 FPS60 FPS
    high58 FPS47 FPS
    ultra48 FPS39 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetEPYC 9355PEPYC 9454P
    1080p
    low658 FPS533 FPS
    medium566 FPS465 FPS
    high459 FPS373 FPS
    ultra397 FPS303 FPS
    1440p
    low548 FPS438 FPS
    medium483 FPS392 FPS
    high404 FPS323 FPS
    ultra328 FPS255 FPS
    4K
    low333 FPS270 FPS
    medium295 FPS246 FPS
    high268 FPS216 FPS
    ultra236 FPS179 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetEPYC 9355PEPYC 9454P
    1080p
    low752 FPS672 FPS
    medium638 FPS561 FPS
    high593 FPS522 FPS
    ultra521 FPS455 FPS
    1440p
    low561 FPS511 FPS
    medium474 FPS426 FPS
    high434 FPS390 FPS
    ultra376 FPS337 FPS
    4K
    low405 FPS377 FPS
    medium326 FPS294 FPS
    high288 FPS263 FPS
    ultra229 FPS211 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetEPYC 9355PEPYC 9454P
    1080p
    low1018 FPS902 FPS
    medium914 FPS822 FPS
    high788 FPS708 FPS
    ultra711 FPS625 FPS
    1440p
    low813 FPS724 FPS
    medium707 FPS631 FPS
    high606 FPS540 FPS
    ultra535 FPS462 FPS
    4K
    low577 FPS519 FPS
    medium512 FPS464 FPS
    high449 FPS407 FPS
    ultra394 FPS350 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9355P and EPYC 9454P

    AMD

    EPYC 9355P

    The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.

    AMD

    EPYC 9454P

    The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 9355P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9454P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9454P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P — a 14.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9355P (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The EPYC 9355P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9454P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the EPYC 9454P's 94,686 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 9355P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureEPYC 9355PEPYC 9454P
    Cores / Threads
    32 / 64
    48 / 96+50%
    Boost Clock
    4.4 GHz+16%
    3.8 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.55 GHz+29%
    2.75 GHz
    L3 Cache
    256 MB (total)
    256 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm-20%
    5 nm, 6 nm
    Architecture
    Turin (2024)
    Genoa (2022−2023)
    PassMark
    97,249+3%
    94,686
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,923
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    18,576
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and SP5 (EPYC 9454P).

    FeatureEPYC 9355PEPYC 9454P
    Socket
    SP5
    SP5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6000
    DDR5-4800
    Max RAM Capacity
    6 TB
    6 TB
    RAM Channels
    12
    12
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P; EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468.

    FeatureEPYC 9355PEPYC 9454P
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    Target Use
    Data Center / Single Socket
    Data Center / Single Socket
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The EPYC 9355P launched at $2998 MSRP, while the EPYC 9454P debuted at $4598. On MSRP ($2998 vs $4598), the EPYC 9355P is $1600 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 20.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9454P — making the EPYC 9355P the 44.7% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9355PEPYC 9454P
    MSRP
    $2998-35%
    $4598
    Performance per Dollar
    32.4+57%
    20.6
    Release Date
    2024
    2022