
EPYC 7773X
Popular choices:

EPYC 9454P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7773X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+142.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,536 vs 1,923).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9454P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $4,202 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,576 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 7773X
2022EPYC 9454P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+142.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+25.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $4,202 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,536 vs 1,923).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,576 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9454P better than EPYC 7773X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | EPYC 9454P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | EPYC 9454P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | EPYC 9454P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | EPYC 9454P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 955 FPS | 902 FPS |
| medium | 867 FPS | 822 FPS |
| high | 742 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 639 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 738 FPS | 724 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 631 FPS |
| high | 547 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 350 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7773X and EPYC 9454P

EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.

EPYC 9454P
EPYC 9454P
The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9454P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7773X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P — a 8.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9454P (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 9454P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the EPYC 9454P's 94,686 — a 3.6% lead for the EPYC 9454P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,536 vs 1,923, a 22.4% lead for the EPYC 9454P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 18,576 (83.1% advantage for the EPYC 7773X). L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454P.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | EPYC 9454P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+33% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.75 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+200% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 91,340 | 94,686+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | 1,923+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+142% | 18,576 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9454P uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454P — the EPYC 9454P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9454P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7773X) vs 12 (EPYC 9454P). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and SP5 (EPYC 9454P).
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | EPYC 9454P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 6 TB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454P). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | EPYC 9454P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Server | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7773X launched at $8800 MSRP, while the EPYC 9454P debuted at $4598. On MSRP ($8800 vs $4598), the EPYC 9454P is $4202 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 20.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9454P — making the EPYC 9454P the 66% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | EPYC 9454P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800 | $4598-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 20.6+98% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













