
EPYC 9454
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9454
2022Why buy it
- ✅+217.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌176.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,776 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 266.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 290W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 87,961).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9454, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9454
2022Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+217.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,776 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 266.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 290W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌176.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 87,961).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9454, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9454 better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 822 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 724 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 631 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9454 and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 9454
EPYC 9454
The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9454 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 21.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2.75 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 104.2% lead for the EPYC 9454. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+500% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz | 3.8 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 87,961+217% | 27,712 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the EPYC 9454 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the EPYC 9454 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9454 launched at $5225 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($5225 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $4776 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 114.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5225 | $449-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.8 | 61.7+267% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












