
EPYC 9454
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9454
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌346.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,026 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 543.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 290W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 9454.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 87,961).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9454, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9454
2022Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,026 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 543.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 290W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 9454.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌346.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 87,961).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9454, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9454 better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 822 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 724 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 631 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9454 and Ryzen 5 5600

EPYC 9454
EPYC 9454
The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9454 has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 2.75 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 121.3% lead for the EPYC 9454. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+700% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz | 3.5 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 87,961+308% | 21,550 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the EPYC 9454 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the EPYC 9454 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9454 launched at $5225 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($5225 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $5026 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 146.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5225 | $199-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.8 | 108.3+545% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












