PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7713

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 290W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 87,961).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9454

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,835 less on MSRP ($5,225 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌28.9% higher power demand at 290W vs 225W.

EPYC 7713

2021

EPYC 9454

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 290W, a 65W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,835 less on MSRP ($5,225 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 87,961).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌28.9% higher power demand at 290W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9454 better than EPYC 7713?

Yes. EPYC 9454 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 11.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9454 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 11.0% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9454 is the better fit. You are getting 6% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9454 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9454 is $1,835 cheaper on MSRP at $5,225 MSRP versus $7,060 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 43.2% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9454 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 64/128. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7713 Benchmark Check

EPYC 9454 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9454
1080p
low	195 FPS	171 FPS
medium	159 FPS	142 FPS
high	129 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	160 FPS	149 FPS
medium	125 FPS	120 FPS
high	97 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	70 FPS
medium	60 FPS	60 FPS
high	47 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open EPYC 9454

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9454
1080p
low	267 FPS	533 FPS
medium	235 FPS	465 FPS
high	193 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	219 FPS	438 FPS
medium	198 FPS	392 FPS
high	167 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	255 FPS
4K
low	135 FPS	270 FPS
medium	124 FPS	246 FPS
high	112 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	179 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open EPYC 9454

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9454
1080p
low	837 FPS	672 FPS
medium	698 FPS	561 FPS
high	650 FPS	522 FPS
ultra	574 FPS	455 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	511 FPS
medium	500 FPS	426 FPS
high	459 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	401 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	430 FPS	377 FPS
medium	336 FPS	294 FPS
high	300 FPS	263 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	211 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open EPYC 9454

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9454
1080p
low	975 FPS	902 FPS
medium	883 FPS	822 FPS
high	758 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	625 FPS
1440p
low	752 FPS	724 FPS
medium	654 FPS	631 FPS
high	558 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	479 FPS	462 FPS
4K
low	540 FPS	519 FPS
medium	479 FPS	464 FPS
high	420 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	363 FPS	350 FPS

Open EPYC 7713 Open EPYC 9454

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9454

EPYC 7713

The EPYC 7713 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,018 points. Launch price was $7,060.

EPYC 9454

The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7713 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9454 offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7713 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713 versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9454 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The EPYC 7713 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9454 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713 scores 83,018 against the EPYC 9454's 87,961 — a 5.8% lead for the EPYC 9454. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9454
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+33%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.75 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	83,018	87,961+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9454 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713 versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454 — the EPYC 7713 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7713 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7713) vs 12 (EPYC 9454). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713) and SP5 (EPYC 9454).

Feature	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9454
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200+63900%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6 TB+157286300%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454). Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 7713 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 7713	EPYC 9454
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	—	Data Center

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7713 launched at $7060 MSRP, while the EPYC 9454 debuted at $5225. On MSRP ($7060 vs $5225), the EPYC 9454 is $1835 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9454 — making the EPYC 9454 the 35.5% better value option.