PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

✅+118.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌204.8% higher power demand at 320W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,757 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 293.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 320W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,888 vs 26,020).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9375F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9375F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅+118.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,757 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 293.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 320W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌204.8% higher power demand at 320W vs 105W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,888 vs 26,020).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9375F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9375F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than EPYC 9375F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9375F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the better fit. You are getting 118.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900X is $4,757 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $5,306 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9375F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 118.9% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 293.1% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 18.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9375F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9375F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	315 FPS	323 FPS
medium	290 FPS	291 FPS
high	240 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	193 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	307 FPS
medium	230 FPS	248 FPS
high	178 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	193 FPS
medium	157 FPS	156 FPS
high	120 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	103 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	725 FPS	772 FPS
medium	618 FPS	647 FPS
high	485 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	450 FPS
1440p
low	579 FPS	619 FPS
medium	510 FPS	536 FPS
high	419 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	365 FPS
medium	300 FPS	318 FPS
high	270 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	255 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	923 FPS	832 FPS
medium	748 FPS	645 FPS
high	675 FPS	558 FPS
ultra	572 FPS	459 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	721 FPS
medium	584 FPS	565 FPS
high	515 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	407 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	511 FPS
medium	421 FPS	421 FPS
high	374 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	308 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	1141 FPS	974 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	974 FPS
high	902 FPS	934 FPS
ultra	813 FPS	826 FPS
1440p
low	890 FPS	959 FPS
medium	784 FPS	843 FPS
high	688 FPS	726 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	617 FPS
4K
low	650 FPS	694 FPS
medium	579 FPS	621 FPS
high	515 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Ryzen 9 5900X

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 9375F has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.85 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 84.3% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 2,174, a 31.3% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 11,888 (74.6% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+167%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+4%	3.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+300%	64 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	95,768+146%	38,955
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,981+37%	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	26,020+119%	11,888

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the EPYC 9375F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the EPYC 9375F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / Frequency Optimized	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. On MSRP ($5306 vs $549), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $4757 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 118.9% better value option.