PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,977 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 277.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 95,768).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9375F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9375F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,977 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 277.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 95,768).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9375F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9375F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9375F better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9375F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the better fit. You are getting 327% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9375F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9375F is 1512.8% more expensive on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 277.7% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 18.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9375F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9375F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	315 FPS	200 FPS
medium	290 FPS	163 FPS
high	240 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	156 FPS
medium	230 FPS	121 FPS
high	178 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	84 FPS
medium	157 FPS	71 FPS
high	120 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	44 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	725 FPS	561 FPS
medium	618 FPS	525 FPS
high	485 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	579 FPS	545 FPS
medium	510 FPS	471 FPS
high	419 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	350 FPS
medium	300 FPS	304 FPS
high	270 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	923 FPS	561 FPS
medium	748 FPS	561 FPS
high	675 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	572 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	561 FPS
medium	584 FPS	561 FPS
high	515 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	499 FPS
medium	421 FPS	394 FPS
high	374 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	275 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 7 3700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	1141 FPS	561 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	561 FPS
high	902 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	813 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	890 FPS	561 FPS
medium	784 FPS	561 FPS
high	688 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	555 FPS
4K
low	650 FPS	561 FPS
medium	579 FPS	501 FPS
high	515 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	396 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Ryzen 7 3700X

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9375F has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 124.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+9%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+7%	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	95,768+327%	22,430
Geekbench 6 Single	2,981	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	26,020	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 9375F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 9375F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	—
Target Use	Data Center / Frequency Optimized	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($5306 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $4977 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 116.3% better value option.