PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,107 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 392.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9375F.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 26,020).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9375F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9375F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,107 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 392.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9375F.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 26,020).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9375F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9375F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9375F better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9375F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the better fit. You are getting 1270.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9375F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9375F is 2566.3% more expensive on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 392.4% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 18.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9375F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9375F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	315 FPS	200 FPS
medium	290 FPS	161 FPS
high	240 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	154 FPS
medium	230 FPS	119 FPS
high	178 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	70 FPS
medium	157 FPS	58 FPS
high	120 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	36 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 5 3600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	725 FPS	442 FPS
medium	618 FPS	404 FPS
high	485 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	295 FPS
1440p
low	579 FPS	420 FPS
medium	510 FPS	359 FPS
high	419 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	263 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	297 FPS
medium	300 FPS	259 FPS
high	270 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	201 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 5 3600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	923 FPS	442 FPS
medium	748 FPS	442 FPS
high	675 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	572 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	442 FPS
medium	584 FPS	442 FPS
high	515 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	442 FPS
medium	421 FPS	361 FPS
high	374 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 5 3600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	1141 FPS	442 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	442 FPS
high	902 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	813 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	890 FPS	442 FPS
medium	784 FPS	442 FPS
high	688 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	442 FPS
4K
low	650 FPS	442 FPS
medium	579 FPS	442 FPS
high	515 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	357 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Ryzen 5 3600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Ryzen 5 3600

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9375F has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 137.6% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 1,295, a 78.9% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 1,898 (172.8% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+433%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+14%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+7%	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	95,768+442%	17,685
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,981+130%	1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi	26,020+1271%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the EPYC 9375F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the EPYC 9375F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	Yes
Target Use	Data Center / Frequency Optimized	Gaming/Budget Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($5306 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $5107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 132.5% better value option.