PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.7% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌52.4% higher power demand at 320W vs 210W.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,266 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 320W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 65,894).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 512 MB).

EPYC 9175F

2024

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.7% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,266 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 210W instead of 320W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌52.4% higher power demand at 320W vs 210W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,568 vs 65,894).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 512 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9175F better than EPYC 9334?

Yes. EPYC 9175F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 23.7% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9175F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 23.7% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9175F is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9175F is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9334 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9175F is 42.3% more expensive on MSRP at $4,256 MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it gives you a 23.7% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9334 is also 41.6% better value on MSRP (21.9 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9175F Benchmark Check

EPYC 9334 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	300 FPS	170 FPS
medium	273 FPS	141 FPS
high	226 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	148 FPS
medium	227 FPS	120 FPS
high	176 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	189 FPS	70 FPS
medium	156 FPS	59 FPS
high	120 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9175F Open EPYC 9334

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	811 FPS	533 FPS
medium	688 FPS	465 FPS
high	539 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	438 FPS
medium	587 FPS	392 FPS
high	474 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	255 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	270 FPS
medium	333 FPS	246 FPS
high	306 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	179 FPS

Open EPYC 9175F Open EPYC 9334

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	922 FPS	646 FPS
medium	746 FPS	538 FPS
high	674 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	436 FPS
1440p
low	723 FPS	502 FPS
medium	582 FPS	417 FPS
high	514 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	510 FPS	374 FPS
medium	420 FPS	291 FPS
high	373 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	208 FPS

Open EPYC 9175F Open EPYC 9334

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	1140 FPS	856 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	786 FPS
high	901 FPS	678 FPS
ultra	813 FPS	598 FPS
1440p
low	890 FPS	689 FPS
medium	782 FPS	605 FPS
high	686 FPS	518 FPS
ultra	596 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	650 FPS	494 FPS
medium	578 FPS	445 FPS
high	513 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	336 FPS

Open EPYC 9175F Open EPYC 9334

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9175F and EPYC 9334

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9334 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+28%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+56%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+300%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	65,894	65,568

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9334 — the EPYC 9175F supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+33%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	EPYC 9334
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9175F launched at $4256 MSRP, while the EPYC 9334 debuted at $2990. On MSRP ($4256 vs $2990), the EPYC 9334 is $1266 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the EPYC 9334 the 34.5% better value option.