Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 9334

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 9334

32 Cores64 Thrd210 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

65,568

+403.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,830 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 271.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9334.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9334 across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 65,568).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.4% higher average FPS across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,830 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 271.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9334.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.4% higher average FPS across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9334 across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 65,568).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9334, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9334 better than Core i5-10400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9334 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9334 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 26.4% more average FPS across 28 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9334 is the better fit. You are getting 403.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9334 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9334 is 1768.8% more expensive on MSRP at $2,990 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 26.4% average FPS lead across 28 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 271.3% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9334 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

EPYC 9334 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	192 FPS	170 FPS
medium	152 FPS	141 FPS
high	123 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	148 FPS
medium	119 FPS	120 FPS
high	97 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	70 FPS
medium	70 FPS	59 FPS
high	55 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open EPYC 9334

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	326 FPS	533 FPS
medium	318 FPS	465 FPS
high	290 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	438 FPS
medium	292 FPS	392 FPS
high	267 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	255 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	270 FPS
medium	258 FPS	246 FPS
high	235 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	179 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open EPYC 9334

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	326 FPS	646 FPS
medium	326 FPS	538 FPS
high	326 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	436 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	502 FPS
medium	326 FPS	417 FPS
high	326 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	374 FPS
medium	326 FPS	291 FPS
high	289 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	208 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open EPYC 9334

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	326 FPS	856 FPS
medium	326 FPS	786 FPS
high	326 FPS	678 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	598 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	689 FPS
medium	326 FPS	605 FPS
high	326 FPS	518 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	494 FPS
medium	326 FPS	445 FPS
high	326 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	336 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open EPYC 9334

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and EPYC 9334

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 9334 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 133.7% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 9334
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	32 / 64+433%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+10%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+7%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-64%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	13,029	65,568+403%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 9334 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9334 — the EPYC 9334 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 12 (EPYC 9334). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 128 (EPYC 9334) — the EPYC 9334 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 9334
Socket	LGA1200	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	4800+119900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+2184433%	6144
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	128+700%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 9334
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the EPYC 9334 debuted at $2990. On MSRP ($160 vs $2990), the Core i5-10400F is $2830 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the Core i5-10400F the 115.1% better value option.